By Keith
McDowell
Superstorm
Sandy! Was it a harbinger of the foretold Biblical Apocalypse brought on by the
sinful ways of humankind or simply a real-life version of a Cecil B. Demille
classic movie epic complete with a parting of the waves? Or could it be a taste
of the future as the effects of global climate change begin to exact their
inexorable toll? Certainly fire, earth, air, and water played their usual roles
as the defining elements of the human experience.
Whatever one
might think about the causative reasons for Superstorm Sandy, if indeed there
are any, it is undoubtedly a tragedy of historic proportions that cannot be
minimized – excepting, of course, those claims by radical jihadists that they
are responsible for the storm. But was it predictable? Are superstorms about to
become a part of our yearly menu of natural disasters?
If you believe
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC) and the predictions from their various reports, the answer is yes.
Superstorm Sandy is only the beginning. Average temperatures will increase by
several degrees and the oceans will rise by several feet before the end of the
Twenty-first Century. And you thought it couldn’t get any hotter in Texas or that
flooding of the New York City subways couldn’t happen!
We’ve all become
inured to the surrealistic debate about climate change and the impact of
humankind on the global ecosystem. But is anyone in government paying
attention? Are we as a society making any effort to plan for the effects of
global climate change? And specifically, have innovators and entrepreneurs
bothered to take on the grand challenge of mitigating the consequences of
natural disasters?
Mercifully, the
answer is yes, but likely not at the level needed to meet the impending crisis.
Furthermore, the “solution vectors” lie not just along the “hard engineering”
axis, but entail other dimensions including “natural infrastructure” such as
swamps and wetlands to mitigate storm surge as well “social infrastructure” –
must humans always inhabit the vulnerable shorelines? Setting aside the
predilection of humans to maximally expose themselves to a disastrous outcome,
it will take a holistic approach to prepare for the coming superstorms.
Take, for
example, the predicted rise in the oceans over the coming decades. Prior to Superstorm Sandy, the State of
New York took such warnings to heart and formed the Sea Level Rise Task Force
whose final report is
available. It’s an interesting report, but like most of the studies that I read
and review, little action has been taken. We’ve now seen what that can mean
when coupled to storm surge and high tide in the tunnels and subways of New
York City. Interestingly, the artistic populace and intelligentsia of New York
City also engaged in the flooding debate prior to the storm through a
production called “Rising Currents”.
People do care about their future!
Innovators have
likewise been at work designing
new devices and barriers such
as “trapbags” to hold back flood waters. Entrepreneurs have been busy putting
new products on the market such as FLOODSTOP by the company Fluvial Innovations. And as
always, the Netherlands continues to lead the world as an innovator of flood
and surge control systems at the size and scale needed to achieve success.
Even our weather prediction systems have undergone significant improvements as
described by John L. Guiney, Chief of a Meteorological Services Division at
NOAA, in a paper entitled “Innovations
and New Technology For Improved Public Weather Systems.”
And not to be
forgotten, our nation’s coastal shoreline and the erosion by hurricanes and
superstorms have been the subject of much controversy and angst due to the high
dollar value of the real estate and our strongly held desire to spend vacation
time at the seashore. A Powerpoint
presentation from the State of Florida provides an interesting review of
innovation and entrepreneurial activity in this important area.
Similar stories
can be found in the construction business with respect to the design and the
materials used to build homes in vulnerable areas. And how about the future of the transportation sector in
terms of rail lines, tunnels, bridges, buses, trains, subways, and cars. Of
course, society still hasn’t figured out how to pay appropriately for the
destruction from such natural disasters. What’s going to happen to our economy
as we see more and more such superstorms?
On a personal
note, I have to relate a story from my days as the Vice President for Research
at The University of Alabama in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. At issue
was what to do with all the debris from that hurricane. In particular, the
biomass power industry in Alabama was prepared to remove woody materials both
from downed forests and from the shoreline and use the material as feedstock
for their power plants. But bureaucracy and red tape got in the way allowing
the wood to rot and become a home for all kinds of nefarious critters and bugs.
What’s going to happen to all that debris from Superstorm Sandy?
Even more
important for our ability to deal with future superstorms, it is essential that
government invest in earth science research as the precursor to new innovations
and entrepreneurship. Is it really a higher priority for America that the rover
Curiosity prowl
around the surface of Mars while earth-based weather and monitoring satellites
need replacement and upgrades – especially those in polar orbits?
No comments:
Post a Comment